User avatar
Amy Diehl, Ph.D. @amydiehl@mstdn.social
4mo
Reviewers in two groups were given identical resumes for Emily Clarke and James Clarke and told they had used AI. Emily's was 2x as likely to raise doubts about competence. "She can't even write a CV herself." But James "just needed a bit of help."
fortune.com/2026/05/10/identical-resume-ai-men-women-response-trust-ability/
⭐1
13
20
0
1
User avatar
🪨 @Varpie@peculiar.florist
4mo
@amydiehl Some say AI tooling is a multiplicator. Here it's just the same: the people showing doubts toward the feminine persona are just using it as an excuse to justify their inherent sexism...
I'd be curious to see more details about the study though: who are the reviewers? How big are the sets of people they have to review? How does the use of AI affect their overall judgement, compared to their gender specific acceptance rate? I just don't understand where this 22% number comes from, but my guess is the use of AI isn't a significant factor here when correlated to gender.
0
0
0
0