User avatar
Mad Villain @are0h@h-i.social
2y
The inescapable truth about tech DOT lgbt was that they were not on my radar at all until one of their mods started lying about me and my project and began boosting and sharing conspiracy theories about both.

I attempted to resolve it with this mod in private but they refused to listen to me and continued to spread misinformation, which lead to the massive racist backlash of last summer that got me harassed, threatened and DDoS’d.

They are not listed on
because of some grudge I have against them, but their own actions which they continue to display to this day.

I haven’t personally added an instance to TBS in over two years.

The community added them to the listing because of their demonstrated behavior of constantly attacking Black and Brown people and then pretending they are not bigots.

Anyone who says otherwise is just not being honest.
1
6
0
0
User avatar
Mad Villain @are0h@h-i.social
2y
There are no instances that are on that are there because they are queer. That doesn’t happen. Anyone who says this are straight up lying. Being queer in the fedi is not something the project tracks. At all.

TBS tracks bad behavior. It tracks bigots, scrappers that act without consent, and place that engage in CSAM. You know, the awful shit. Places that have a history of doing awful shit.

False positives do happen on occasion, but they are dealt with as they are reported.

So if you’re listed on TBS, at least two sources have clocked them for bad behavior.

It’s a community tool, not a personal database.
1
2
0
0
User avatar
Mad Villain @are0h@h-i.social
2y
How operates is detailed on the site itself, so anyone can go read it if they are curious. All the info is there.

So if you see someone talking about the project, but they don’t actually link to it, ask them why they don’t.

The answer will make their intentions clear. Guaranteed.

Because it will have nothing to do with making the fedi safer.
1
4
0
0
User avatar
Markus Werle @markuswerle@nrw.social
2y
@are0h I stumbled upon your post and I just read through the complete procedure. I feel that’s this is quite an effective way to deal with harassment but I also feel uneasy about the asymmetry in how you can get onto the list and how you get off it. To me it appears similar to US no flight lists. Some people put you there and you fight for a lifetime.
2
0
0
0
User avatar
Markus Werle @markuswerle@nrw.social
2y
@are0h Banning people from social media these days is not something that should be a as easy as described. I can not read from the website what rules exactly apply. The things mentioned are vague enough to encourage abuse and I think that any censorship needs extra due diligence.
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Mad Villain @are0h@h-i.social
2y
@markuswerle Here again, you are openly admitting you are not reading what is posted because there is a criteria and process.

You’re just lying to the person that created the project about things that I know are in place.

That’s strike two.
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Markus Werle @markuswerle@nrw.social
2y
@are0h I feel misunderstood. Of course there is criteria and a process. I simply disagree with ist maturity and I doubt it to be fair. You might be too often harassed by white supremacists, so maybe you are not ready to see the problematic part of the current approach because the other side is more dangerous and louder. That is ok for me. I won’t push any longer. Go ahead and do what you think is right. May my words be remembered when you realize the Fediverse grossly failed.
2
0
0
0
User avatar
Mad Villain @are0h@h-i.social
2y
@markuswerle And as I said, your disagreement is based on pure ignorance as you have not demonstrated you have read information that is available and are making assertions based on nothing.

I don’t care what is ok for you. That is not the topic of discussion.

Your pessimism about the fedi is not my problem. If you want to project your doom and gloom because you don’t want to help in any way shape or form, that is your business.

Some of aren’t as lazy and shallow as that.
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Markus Werle @markuswerle@nrw.social
2y
@are0h I understand where your perception of reality stems from and I won’t argue against it. I am disappointed that I am faced with "you don’t read”. When I was younger I also was with the ones with the (alleged) higher moral standards. Go ahead shaping the world around you and let me continue to suffer under this system, living in constant fear of getting deplatformed for no good reason and self-censoring what I would like to express.
2
0
0
0
User avatar
Océane @oceane@peculiar.florist
2y
@markuswerle 100daystooffload.com

Do it and you won't have to self-censor or fear being deplatformed.

By the way, you're not "self-censoring". You fear being dogpiled like on Twitter, something that TBS is meant to protect you against. On any small, friendly instance, your admin will have your back and take time addressing thé issue before e.g. in its most extreme form, a permanent account suspension. It happened to me on social.coop with mods reaching out to me several times as a quick reminder that X isn't OK.

Ro isn't deplatforming you so long as you're not a threat to Black users. Saying something inappropriate might get you blocked for good reasons, but not deplatformed.

Your post above makes me think that
the challenge I'm linking in this post might change your life like it's changed mine. I can't stress enough how transformative it would be in your life.
0
0
0
0