User avatar
jonny (nonvenomous) @jonny@neuromatch.social
2y
One of the best feelings in the world is to find someone thinking about exactly the same things as you at exactly the same time but further along. Then you get to see into the future, only its a different future where you are also a different person that can see the problem in a different way than you can. It seems like the healthy response is to want to talk to that person and hear what they think and tell them what you think, since you are both thinking about the same things.

How sad is it that many of our friends in academia feel exactly the opposite: you need to constantly be watching out for someone thinking about the same things as you to beat them, cut them down, or coopt them. The last thing you would do is talk to them, because they might "steal" your precious ideas.

The prestige cult is depressing, and if that's an inroad to help our colleagues help themselves to not do DoD supersoldier research or pay for another RELX/ICE surveillance apparatus it seems worth taking
5
2
0
0
User avatar
Jo Etzel @JosetAEtzel@fediscience.org
2y
@jonny Definitely too many of these information-hoarding folks around, but they're not the only type.

I've found that the amount of data and code sharing can be a proxy for likelihood of collaboration; less sharing is a red flag. I see federally-funded research as a form of public service; unethical not to help others build on our work.
1
1
0
0
User avatar
jonny (nonvenomous) @jonny@neuromatch.social
2y
@JosetAEtzel
Amen, Jo
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Océane @oceane@peculiar.florist
2y
@jonny @JosetAEtzel I've read a sketchy guy on Facebook saying he didn't care if Facebook could steal his writing because he could write others. Words to live by, IMHO – if people build upon my work and complement it, then that's kinda the point I guess, and I can't wait to build upon theirs.
0
0
0
0